H.R. 5107: Common-Sense Law Enforcement and Accountability Now in DC Act
This bill, known as the Common-Sense Law Enforcement and Accountability Now in D.C. Act, aims to repeal the Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act of 2022 that was put in place by the District of Columbia Council. Here are the key points of what the bill would do:
Short Title
The bill is referred to as the CLEAN DC Act. This is the official name but does not elaborate on its provisions.
Repeal of Prior Legislation
The primary action of this bill is the repeal of the Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act of 2022 (D.C. Law 24–345). The repeal means that all the rules, regulations, and provisions that were changed or nullified by the 2022 Act would be reinstated as if that Act had never been enacted. This includes any law or measure that the Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act altered.
Implications of Repeal
The repeal would revert policing policies in Washington, D.C., to their state before the implementation of the 2022 Act. This could impact various aspects of law enforcement, including:
- Rules regarding police accountability and oversight
- Procedures for use of force by police officers
- Policies aimed at preventing racial profiling and promoting community safety
- Training and operational standards for law enforcement personnel
The bill has significant implications for the relationship between law enforcement and the communities they serve in Washington, D.C.
Legislative Process
The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives on September 3, 2025, by Mr. Clyde and co-sponsored by several other representatives. As of now, it has been referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform for further consideration.
Relevant Companies
None found.
This is an AI-generated summary of the bill text. There may be mistakes.
Sponsors
30 bill sponsors
-
TrackAndrew S. Clyde
Sponsor
-
TrackMark E. Amodei
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJodey C. Arrington
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAaron Bean
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackNicholas Begich
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAndy Biggs
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackSheri Biggs
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackLauren Boebert
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJosh Brecheen
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackTim Burchett
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackEric Burlison
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackEarl L. "Buddy" Carter
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackElijah Crane
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackHenry Cuellar
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackWarren Davidson
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackByron Donalds
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackBrandon Gill
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackPaul A. Gosar
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDiana Harshbarger
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackClay Higgins
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAshley Hinson
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAnna Paulina Luna
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMary E. Miller
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackBarry Moore
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackTroy E. Nehls
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAndrew Ogles
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackChip Roy
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackKeith Self
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackPete Stauber
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackBeth Van Duyne
Co-Sponsor
Actions
17 actions
| Date | Action |
|---|---|
| Nov. 20, 2025 | Received in the Senate. |
| Nov. 19, 2025 | Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H4806-4807) |
| Nov. 19, 2025 | Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 879. (consideration: CR H4800-4805) |
| Nov. 19, 2025 | DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 5107. |
| Nov. 19, 2025 | Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. |
| Nov. 19, 2025 | On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 233 - 190 (Roll no. 299). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H4800-4801) |
| Nov. 19, 2025 | Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 233 - 190 (Roll no. 299). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H4800-4801) |
| Nov. 19, 2025 | POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 5107, the Chair put the question on passage of the bill and by voice vote announced the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Clyde demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced. |
| Nov. 19, 2025 | Rule provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 80, H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, H. Con. Res. 58, H.R. 1949, H.R. 3109, H.R. 5107 and H.R. 5214. The resolution provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 80, H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, H. Con. Res. 58, H.R. 1949, H.R. 3109, H.R. 5107, and H.R. 5214 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate on each measure. The resolution also provides for one motion to recommit on H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, H.R. 1949, H.R. 3109, H.R. 5107, and H.R. 5214, and one motion to commit S.J. Res. 80. |
| Nov. 19, 2025 | The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. |
| Nov. 17, 2025 | Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 879 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 80, H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, H. Con. Res. 58, H.R. 1949, H.R. 3109, H.R. 5107 and H.R. 5214. The resolution provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 80, H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, H. Con. Res. 58, H.R. 1949, H.R. 3109, H.R. 5107, and H.R. 5214 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate on each measure. The resolution also provides for one motion to recommit on H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, H.R. 1949, H.R. 3109, H.R. 5107, and H.R. 5214, and one motion to commit S.J. Res. 80. |
| Sep. 30, 2025 | Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 271. |
| Sep. 30, 2025 | Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. H. Rept. 119-317. |
| Sep. 10, 2025 | Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held |
| Sep. 10, 2025 | Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 26 - 19. |
| Sep. 03, 2025 | Introduced in House |
| Sep. 03, 2025 | Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. |
Corporate Lobbying
0 companies lobbying
None found.
* Note that there can be significant delays in lobbying disclosures, and our data may be incomplete.
Potentially Relevant Congressional Stock Trades
No relevant congressional stock trades found.